Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ThinkOptics, Inc v. Nintendo of America, Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00455 (E.D. Tex. June 21, 2014)

Granted
Daubert / Expert Challenges Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00455, Dkt. No. 435
Decided
June 21, 2014
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 349 Sealed Motion. If Nintendo intends to rely on Professor Slottje's reasonably royalty analysis at trial, Professor Slottje must amend his report and recalculate his reasonable royalty in light of the Court's ruling by June…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is ThinkOptics, Inc.’s (“ThinkOptics”) Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Daniel J. Slottje (Docket No. 349). The Court heard arguments regarding this Motion on May 15, 2014. Based on the parties’ briefings and arguments, the Motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND ThinkOptics, Inc. (“ThinkOptics”) filed this lawsuit on September 2, 2011, accusing several Defendants of infringing three patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,796,116; 7,852,317; and 7,864,159.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case