Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ThinkOptics, Inc v. Nintendo of America, Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00455 (E.D. Tex. July 22, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00455, Dkt. No. 236
Decided
July 22, 2013
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 7,796,116 (“the ‘116 Patent”), 7,852,317 (“the ‘317 Patent”), and 7,864,159 (“the ‘159 Patent”). BACKGROUND The Plaintiff ThinkOptics, Inc. (“ThinkOptics”) sued the following de fendants for infringement of the ‘116, ‘317, and ‘159 Patents: Nintendo of America, Inc.; Nintendo Co., Ltd.; Intec, Inc.; and Nyko Technologies, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”).