Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ThinkOptics, Inc v. Nintendo of America, Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00455 (E.D. Tex. June 21, 2014)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00455, Dkt. No. 434
Decided
June 21, 2014
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 321 Sealed Motion. If ThinkOptics intends to rely on Mr. Bokharts reasonably royalty analysis at trial, Mr. Bokhart must amend his report and recalculate his reasonable royalty in light of the Courts ruling by June 27, 2014 a…
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Nintendo of America, Inc. and Nintendo Co., Ltd.’s (collectively, “Nintendo”) Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Christopher Bokhart (Docket No. 321). The Court heard arguments regarding this Motion on May 15, 2014. Based on the parties’ briefings and arguments, the Motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND ThinkOptics, Inc. (“ThinkOptics”) filed this lawsuit on September 2, 2011, accusing several Defendants of infringing three patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,796,116; 7,852,317; and 7,864,159.