Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 6:09-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 15, 2013)

Granted in Part
Injunction Damages Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 1176
Decided
March 15, 2013
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Samsung is ORDERED pay Fractus an ongoing royalty rate of $0.60 per phone on all adjudicated phones
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Fractus’ Motion to Set an Ongoing Royalty Rate (Cause No. 6:12-cv- 421 (“Fractus II”), Docket No. 24. As stated at the hearing, Fractus’ Motion to Set an Ongoing Royalty Rate is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Samsung IS ORDERED pay Fractus an ongoing royalty rate of $0.60 per phone on all adjudicated phones. BACKGROUND Fractus filed suit on May 5, 2009, alleging th at Samsung and several other defendants infringed U.S. Patent Nos.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case