Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 6:09-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 17, 2010)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

AND OPINION This claim construction opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 7,015,868 (the ‘868); 7,123,208 (the ‘208); 7,394,432 (the ‘432); 7,397,431 (the ‘431); 7,528,782 (the ‘782); 7,148,850 (the ‘850); 7,202,822 (the ‘822); 7,312,762 (the ‘762); 7,411,556 (the ‘556) (collectively “patents-in-suit”). The parties have presented their claim construction positions with Defendants diverging on some terms and filing separate oppositions. 1 (Doc. Nos. 423, “PL.’S BR.;” 428 “PKU DEF. RESP.;” 430, “DEF.’S RESP.,” 439, “PL.’S REPLY”).