Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 6:09-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. June 28, 2012)

Granted in Part
JMOL / Post-Trial Infringement Willfulness Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103)
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 1113
Decided
June 28, 2012
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court DENIES Samsungs Renewed Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law 1025; DENIES Samsungs Motion Under Rule 52 for Entry of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Regarding Indefiniteness 1026; DENIES Sa…
Length
85 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the parties’ post-tria l motions. Having considered the parties’ written submissions and oral arguments, the Court: DENIES Samsung’s Renewed Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law that : (1) Samsung Does Not Infringe Any Claim of the Patents-in- Suit; (2) the Asserted Claims of the Patents-in -Suit are Invalid; (3) Samsung is Not A Willful Infringer; and (4) the Damages Award wa s Improper (Docket No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case