Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Wapp Tech Limited Partnership et al v. Micro Focus International PLC, No. 4:18-cv-00469 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 4, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:18-cv-00469, Dkt. No. 383
Decided
February 4, 2021
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 266 Opposed SEALED MOTION to Strike and Exclude Undisclosed Witnesses and Documents Relied Upon in Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Rebuttal Expert Reports filed by Wapp Tech Corp., Wapp Tech …
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike and Exclude Undisclosed Witnesses and Documents Relied Upon in Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Rebuttal Expert Reports (Dkt. #266). Having considered the Motion and the relevant briefing, the Court finds the Motion should be DENIED. BACKGROUND This is a patent infringement suit. As trial approaches, the parties filed numerous competing motions regarding witnesses, evidence, and expert testimony.