Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

E-System Design, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation, No. 4:17-cv-00682 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 17, 2018)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00682, Dkt. No. 98
Decided
December 17, 2018
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. #59) is hereby DENIED
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Mentor Graphics Corp.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. #59). After reviewing the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the motion should be denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff asserts that Defendants infringe claims of U.S. P atent No. 8,352,232 (“the ’232 Patent”). The ’232 Patent is titled “ Modeling Electrical Interconnections in Three -Dimensional Structures.” It was issued on January 8, 2013, and bears an earliest priority date of October 25, 2007.