Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

E-System Design, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation, No. 4:17-cv-00682 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 4, 2018)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00682, Dkt. No. 37
Decided
April 4, 2018
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant Mentor Graphics Corporation's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing (Dkt. #9) is hereby DENIED
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Mentor Gra phics Corporation’s (“Mentor”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing (Dkt. #9). After reviewing the relevant pleadings and motion, the Court finds that the motion should be denied. BACKGROUND This is a suit about a patent licensee suing for patent infringement. On January 14, 2008, the patent licensor—Georgia Tech Research Co mpany (“Georgia Tech”)—executed a licensing agreement (the “Original License Agreement”) with the patent licensee—Plaintiff E-System Design (“E-System”) (Dkt. #9 at p. 6).