Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

E-System Design, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation, No. 4:17-cv-00682 (E.D. Tex. June 1, 2018)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00682, Dkt. No. 46
Decided
June 1, 2018
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant Mentor Graphics Corporation's Motion toTransfer Venue (Dkt. #26) is hereby DENIED
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Mentor Gra phics Corporation’s (“Mentor”) Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. #26). After reviewing the relevant pleadings and motion, the Court finds that the motion should be denied. BACKGROUND This is a suit about a patent licensee suing for patent infringement. On January 14, 2008, the patent licensor—Georgia Tech Research Co mpany (“Georgia Tech”)—executed a licensing agreement with the patent licensee—Plaintiff E- System Design, Inc. (“E-System”) (Dkt. #9 at p. 6).