Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Motio, Inc. v. BSP Software LLC, No. 4:12-cv-00647 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2016)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:12-cv-00647, Dkt. No. 241
Decided
January 6, 2016
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - GRANTING 180 SEALED MOTION to Strike the Expert Disclosure of J. Lynn Moore and Preclude Testimony by Him filed by Avnet, Inc
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendants‟ Motion to Strike the Expert Disclosure of J. Lynn Moore and to Preclude any Expert Testimony by Him (Dkt. #180 ). After reviewing the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the motion should be granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiff asserts that Defendants infringe claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,285,678 (“the ‟678 Patent”). The ‟678 Patent is titled “ Continuous integration of business intelligence software.” It was filed on December 30, 2010, and issued on October 9, 2012 .