Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Motio, Inc. v. BSP Software LLC, No. 4:12-cv-00647 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2016)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:12-cv-00647, Dkt. No. 248
Decided
January 19, 2016
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE 221 MOTION in Limine #1 TO EXCLUDE ARGUMENT AND EVIDENCE SUPPORTING CLAIMS OF NON-INFRINGEMENT NOT DISCLOSED IN RESPONSE TO CONTENTION INTERROGATORIES filed by Motio, Inc., 223 MOTION in Limine filed by Avnet…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court are Plaintiff and Defendants’ Motions in Limine (Dkts. #221- 23). After considering the pleadings and hearing argument at a Pre -Trial Hearing on January 14, 2016, the Court rules on the motions as follows: Plaintiff’s Motion #1 Granted. Defendants shall not argue to the jury or present evidence at trial related to non- infringement arguments that were not disclosed in response to contention interrogatories dated June 27, 2013, and March 13, 2015 (Dkt. #221, Ex. A). Plaintiff’s Motion #2, Defendants’ Motion #1 Granted.