Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Imperium (IP) Holdings, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al, No. 4:11-cv-00163 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 31, 2013)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Summary Judgment Indefiniteness Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:11-cv-00163, Dkt. No. 407
Decided
January 31, 2013
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DENYING 182 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Apple Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc., 211 Report and Recommendations
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1 United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION § § IMPERIUM (IP) HOLDINGS, INC. § § v. § Case No. 4:11-CV-163 § Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant APPLE, INC. et. al. § § § Memorandum Adopting Report and Recommendation re Indefiniteness of ‘768 Patent, Claims 15 and 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 this matter wa s referred to the Unite d States Magistrate Judge, who entered containing a recommenda tion that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment of indefiniteness as to claims 15 a nd 16 of United States Patent No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case