Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Imperium (IP) Holdings, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al, No. 4:11-cv-00163 (E.D. Tex. July 23, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:11-cv-00163, Dkt. No. 225
Decided
July 23, 2012
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DENYING 152 Sealed Motion, filed by Kyocera Communications, Inc., 197 Report and Recommendations
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the Unit ed States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Ma gistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On June 4, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Kyocera Communications, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1) for Lack of Standing [Doc. #152] be denied.