Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Imperium (IP) Holdings, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al, No. 4:11-cv-00163 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2012)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:11-cv-00163, Dkt. No. 141
Decided
February 13, 2012
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 103 Motion to Sever
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 20, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion to Sever Pursuant to Rules 20 and 21 and to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Dkt. No. 103) be denied.