Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Daingean Technologies ltd. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00347 (E.D. Tex. July 7, 2025)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00347, Dkt. No. 449
Decided
July 7, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 412
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant T -Mobile USA, Inc (“Defendant”) previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Daingean’ s Use of L icensed Andr oid Handsets in its Infringement and Damages Theories (Dkt. No. 264.) And Plaintiff Daingean Technologies ltd. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants ’ License Defense Based on Certain Agreements (Dkt. No. 273). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 412), recommending denial of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment , and grant of Plaintiff ’s Motion.