Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Daingean Technologies ltd. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00347 (E.D. Tex. June 29, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00347, Dkt. No. 421
Decided
June 29, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Daingean Technologies Ltd.’s Motion to Exclude Certain of Ms. Bennis’s Opinions Under Daubert. Dkt. No. 178. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion IN PART. I. Legal Standard An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimony is the p…