Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Slyde Analytics LLC v. Zepp Health Corporation, No. 2:23-cv-00172 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 24, 2024)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00172, Dkt. No. 69
Decided
September 24, 2024
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 61 Report and Recommendations re 27 Motion to Dismiss filed by Zepp Health Corporation (Motion(s)27 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Zepp Health Corporation’s (“Zepp”) Corrected Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Docket No. 66. For the reasons described below, Defendant’s objections (Docket No. 66) are OVERRRULED, and the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 61) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Slyde Analytics, LLC (“Slyde”) accuses Zepp of infringing a set of patents (collectively “Asserted Patents”) 1 relating to smartwatches (“Accused Products”).