Slyde Analytics LLC v. Zepp Health Corporation, No. 2:23-cv-00172 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 24, 2024)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is Defendant Zepp Health Corporation’s (“Zepp”) Corrected Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Docket No. 66. For the reasons described below, Defendant’s objections (Docket No. 66) are OVERRRULED, and the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 61) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Slyde Analytics, LLC (“Slyde”) accuses Zepp of infringing a set of patents (collectively “Asserted Patents”) 1 relating to smartwatches (“Accused Products”).
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error