Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Slyde Analytics LLC v. Zepp Health Corporation, No. 2:23-cv-00172 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00172, Dkt. No. 61
Decided
August 28, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 27 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(7) filed by Zepp Health Corporation. Objections due within 14 days of receipt
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(7) . (Dkt. No. 27). After consideration, the motion should be DENIED for the reasons provided below. I. APPLICABLE LAW “[A] Rule 12(b)(7) analysis entails two inquiries under Rule 19.” H.S. Res., Inc. v. Wingate, 327 F.3d 432, 439 (5th Cir. 2003). First, the Court must determine under Rule 19(a) whether a person should be joined to the lawsuit. Id.