Slyde Analytics LLC v. Zepp Health Corporation, No. 2:23-cv-00172 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 22, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendan t’s Motion to Transfer to the Central District of California . (Dkt. No. 11). After consideration, the Court concludes that Zepp has not met its burden of showing that the Central District of California would be a clearly more convenient venue. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Zepp’s Motion to Transfer. I. APPLICABLE LAW A federal district court may transfer a case “for the convenience of parties and witnesses” to “any other district or division where it might have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).