Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Force Mos Technology Co., Ltd. v. Asustek Computer, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00460 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00460, Dkt. No. 336
Decided
January 22, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 166 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the 409 Patent for Lack of Standing filed by ASUSTeK Computer, Inc.. (Motion(s)166 terminated)
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are (1) Defendant ASUSTek Computer, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment as to the ’409 Patent for Lack of Standing (Dkt. No. 166, the “Standing MSJ”), (2) Plaintiff Force MOS Technology, Co., Ltd.’ s (“Plaintiff” and with Defendant, the “ Parties”) Motion in Limine No. 4 (Dkt. No. 256), and (3) Defendant ’ s Motion in Limine No. 5 (Dkt. No. 257).