Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Force Mos Technology Co., Ltd. v. Asustek Computer, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00460 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 4, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00460, Dkt. No. 289
Decided
September 4, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 267 SEALED MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION AND FOR SANCTIONS filed by ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. (Motion(s)267 terminated)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant ASUSTek Computer, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “ASUSTek”) Motion to Compel the Deposition of Ping-Chia (Rafael) Chung and for Sanctions (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 267.) In the Motion, Defendant “requests the Court to Order Plaintiff to re-produce Mr. Chung for an additional remote deposition for one hour, using an agreed interpreter (to avoid a check interpreter), at Plaintiff’s cost and expense, and any other relief that the Court deems appropriate.” ( Id.