Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pardalis Technology Licensing, L.L.C. v. International Business Machines Corporation, No. 2:22-cv-00452 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 19, 2024)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00452, Dkt. No. 273
Decided
September 19, 2024
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 124 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 126 Sealed Motion; granting in part and denying in part 127 Sealed Motion; denying 129 Sealed Motion; denying 130 Sealed Motion; denying 132 Sealed Motion; adopting Report and …
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff Pardalis Technology Licensing, L.L.C. (“Plaintiff”) previously filed the following motions: • Plaintiff Pardalis Technology Licensing L.L.C.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Concerning Inequitable Conduct (Dkt. No. 124) • Plaintiff Pardalis Technology Licensing, L.L.C.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Validity (Dkt. No.