Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pardalis Technology Licensing, L.L.C. v. International Business Machines Corporation, No. 2:22-cv-00452 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 4, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00452, Dkt. No. 260
Decided
September 4, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 125 SEALED MOTION to Strike Portions of the Expert Reports and to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Don Turnbull filed by Pardalis Technology Licensing, L.L.C.. (Motion(s)125 terminated)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Pardalis’s Motion to Strike and E xclude Testimony of Dr. Don Turnbull (Dkt. No. 125.) For the reasons provide d below, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. APPLICABLE LAW An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimony is the product of reliable…