Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pardalis Technology Licensing, L.L.C. v. International Business Machines Corporation, No. 2:22-cv-00452 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 3, 2024)

Denied
Summary Judgment Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103)
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00452, Dkt. No. 258
Decided
September 3, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 126 SEALED MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the '696, '869, and '668 Patents Based on Obviousness-Type Double Patenting filed by International Business Machines Corporation. Objections due w…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant International Business Machines Corporation’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of I nvalidity of the ’696, ’869, and ’668 Patents Based on Obviousness-Type Double Patenting. (Dkt. No. 126.) IBM contends that the ’696, ’869, and ’668 patents received patent term adjustments but a subsequently-filed continuation issued without a term adjustment and has now expired.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case