Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

STA Group LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00381 (E.D. Tex. June 5, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00381, Dkt. No. 368
Decided
June 5, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 246 (Motion(s)246 terminated)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review and Contingent Motion to Sever and Consolidate Counterclaims filed by Defendant Motorola Solutions, Inc. Dkt. No. 246; Dkt. No. 268 (reply). Plaintiff STA Group LLC opposed the Motion. Dkt. No. 261. For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED. I. LEGAL STANDARD “The party seeking a stay bears the burden of showing that such a course is appropriate.” Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. Flywheel Sports, Inc., No. 218-cv-390-RWS-RSP, 2019 WL 3826051, at *1 (E.D. Tex. Aug.