STA Group LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00381 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Motorola Solutions, Inc.’s Motion for Protective O rder Partially Quashing or Limiting 30(B)(1) Deposition of Dr. Rajan Naik. (Dkt. No. 217.) After consideration, the Court GRANTS Motorola’s motion as provided below. I. BACKGROUND STA Group served a number of Rule 30(B)(1) deposition notices and two Rule 30(b)(6) notices. (Mot. at 2.) One of the 30(b)(1) notices is addressed to Dr. Naik. (Id.) Motorola contends Dr. Naik is an apex witness based on his position as a senior executive and a member of the executive team. ( Id.