Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

STA Group LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00381 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 10, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00381, Dkt. No. 237
Decided
March 10, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 105 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by STA Group LLC
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is STA Group LLC’s Partial Motion to Dismiss Motorola Solutions, Inc.’s Counterclaims for Failure to State a Claim. Dkt. No. 105. For the following reasons, the Motion should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND STA’s complaint alleges that Motorola infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,324,802 (the “’ 802 Patent”), 8,489,134 (the “’ 134 Patent”), 8,994,830 (the “’ 830 Patent”), and 8,831,664 (the “’664 Patent”).