Correct Transmission, LLC v. Nokia Corporation et al, No. 2:22-cv-00343 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 21, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Correct Transmission, LLC’s (“CT”) Motion for Summary Judgment on Certain of Nokia’s Affirmative Defenses. (Dkt. No. 107.) After consideration, the Court recommends the motion should be GRANT ED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART as provided below. In its motion, CT alleges Nokia has failed to support certain of its affirmative defenses, namely waiver, estoppel, acquiescence, unclean hands, prosecution history estoppel, acts of others, license, implied license, exhaustion, and patent misus e. (Mot.