Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ollnova Technologies Limited v. Ecobee Technologies, ULC d/b/a/ Ecobee, No. 2:22-cv-00072 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 5, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00072, Dkt. No. 291
Decided
September 5, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 247 MOTION for New Trial Regarding Verdict Form filed by Ecobee Technologies ULC. (Motion(s)247 terminated)
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for New Trial Based on the Improper Infringement Question in the Verdict Form or, in the Alternative for an Amended Judgment Setting the Appropriate Start Date for Prejudgment Interest (the “Motion”) filed by Defendant ecobee Technologies ULC d/b/a/ ecobee (“ecobee”). (Dkt. No. 247.) In the Motion, ecobee moves for a new trial on the basis that “the verdict form improperly combined the issues of infringement of thirteen claims . . .