Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ollnova Technologies Limited v. Ecobee Technologies, ULC d/b/a/ Ecobee, No. 2:22-cv-00072 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 5, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00072, Dkt. No. 290
Decided
September 5, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 243 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Invalidity under 35 USC 101 of the claims of '495 Patent filed by Ecobee Technologies ULC. (Motion(s)243 terminated)
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the Alternative, a New Trial, Regarding Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,860,495 (the “Motion”) filed by Defendant ecobee Technologies ULC d/b/a/ ecobee (“ecobee”). In the Motion, ecobee moves for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) on the grounds that no reasonable juror could have found the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,860,495 (the “’495 Patent”) to be not ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.