Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Metacluster LT, UAB v. Bright Data Ltd., No. 2:22-cv-00011 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 7, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00011, Dkt. No. 340
Decided
March 7, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 114 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Metacluster LT, UAB
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Metacluster LT, UAB ("Metacluster") previously filed a Motion to Dismiss (the "Motion"). (Dkt. No. 114.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 156), recommending denial of Metacluster’s Motion to Dismiss. Metacluster has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 162).