Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Metacluster LT, UAB v. Bright Data Ltd., No. 2:22-cv-00011 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 25, 2023)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00011, Dkt. No. 97
Decided
January 25, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 81 Report and Recommendations. Court OVERRULES Bright Data Ltd.s objections, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for a More Definite…
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Bright Data Ltd. previously moved to dismiss or in the alternative for a more definite statement ( Dkt. No. 32) and moved for sanctions pursuant to Federal R ule o f Civil Procedure 11 (Dkt. No. 47). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 81), recommending that both motions be denied. Bright Data Ltd. has now filed objections (Dkt. No. 89), with Metacluster LT, UAB filing a response (Dkt. No. 94).