Metacluster LT, UAB v. Bright Data Ltd., No. 2:22-cv-00011 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 25, 2023)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Defendant Bright Data Ltd. previously moved to dismiss or in the alternative for a more definite statement ( Dkt. No. 32) and moved for sanctions pursuant to Federal R ule o f Civil Procedure 11 (Dkt. No. 47). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 81), recommending that both motions be denied. Bright Data Ltd. has now filed objections (Dkt. No. 89), with Metacluster LT, UAB filing a response (Dkt. No. 94).
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error