Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Metacluster LT, UAB v. Bright Data Ltd., No. 2:22-cv-00011 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 20, 2022)

Denied
Motion to Dismiss Infringement Contentions
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00011, Dkt. No. 81
Decided
December 20, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 32 SEALED PATENT MOTION TO DISMISS METACLUSTER'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Bright Data Ltd., 47 MOTION for Sanctions PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PROC. RULE 11 filed by Bright Data Ltd
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court defendant Bright Data Ltd. (“BD”) moves to dismiss or alternatively for a more definite statement and separately moves for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. Dkt. Nos. 32, 47. For the following reasons, the motions should be DENIED. I. Background Plaintiff Metacluster LT, UAB (“MC”) brought suit against BD alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Numbers 10,601,948 (the “’948 Patent”), 9,503,498 (the “’498 Patent”), and 9,516,091 (the “’091 Patent”).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case