Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Carvana LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00482 (E.D. Tex. May 5, 2023)

Granted in Part
Daubert / Expert Challenges Motion to Strike
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00482, Dkt. No. 404
Decided
May 5, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 220 SEALED PATENT MOTION Plaintiff's Daubert Motion to Exclude Portions of the Expert Report and Proffered Testimony of Defendants' Expert Witness, Dr. Walt Magnussen, Jr. filed by Estech Systems IP, LLC, 217 SEALED PATE…
Length
25 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are three of Plaintiff Estech Systems IP, LLC’s motions to strike (Dkt. Nos. 217, 219, 220) .1 For the following reasons , each motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I. BACKGROUND On December 31, 2021, Estech filed suit against Defendants 2 alleging that Conduent infringes U.S. Patent No. 7,123,699 (the “’699 Patent”),3 and Liberty Mutual infringes both the ’699 Patent and U.S. Patent No. 7,068,684 (the “’684 Patent”)4 (collectively, the “Asserted 1 Citations to docket and page number correspond to those assigned via ECF.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case