Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Carvana LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00482 (E.D. Tex. May 2, 2023)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00482, Dkt. No. 401
Decided
May 2, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 213 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment Regarding Priority and Invalildity filed by Conduent Business Process Optimization Services, Inc., Public Storage, Conduent Legal & Compliance Solutions, LLC, Conduent Bus…
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two of Defendants’1 motions for summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 212, 213).2 For the following reasons, the motions should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On December 31, 2021, Estech filed suit against Defendants 3 alleging that Conduent infringes U.S. Patent No. 7,123,699 (the “’699 Patent”),4 and Liberty Mutual infringes both the ’699 Patent and U.S. Patent No.