Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Carvana LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00482 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 13, 2023)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00482, Dkt. No. 355
Decided
April 13, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 224 Opposed SEALED MOTION Defendants' Motion to Strike Expert Opinions of Dr. R. Sukumar and Mr. Benedict Occhiogrosso filed by 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC, 99 Cents Only Stores Texas, Inc., Conduent Business Process Optim…
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two of Defendants’1 motions to strike (Dkt. Nos. 215, 224). 2 For the following reasons, the Motion to Exclude Dr. R. Sukumar’s Expert Report ( Dkt. No. 215) is DENIED, and the Motion to Strike Expert Opinions of Dr. R. Sukumar (Dkt. No. 224) is also DENIED. The motion to strike regarding Mr. Occhiogrosso will be further addressed at the April 24 hearing. I. B ACKGROUND On December 31, 2021, Estech filed suit against Defendants 3 alleging that Defendants infringe U.S. Patent Nos.