Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Orange Electronic Co. Ltd. v. Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd., No. 2:21-cv-00240 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 21, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00240, Dkt. No. 54
Decided
September 21, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd.’s (“Autel ITC”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Insufficient Service of Process, and Failure to State a Claim (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 9). Having considered the Motion, the subsequent briefing, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On June 30, 2021, Orange Electronic Co. Ltd. (“Orange”) filed suit against Autel ITC, asserting infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,031,064C3 (the “’064 Patent”). (Dkt. No.