Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Orange Electronic Co. Ltd. v. Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd., No. 2:21-cv-00240 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2022)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00240, Dkt. No. 49
Decided
September 9, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 37 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File MOTION Leave to Effect Service by Alternate Means filed by Orange Electronic Co. Ltd
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Orange Electronic Co. Ltd.’s (“Orange”) Motion for Leave to Effect Service by Alternate Means (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 37). Having considered the Motion, the subsequent briefing, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND On June 30, 2021, Orange filed a lawsuit against Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd. (“Autel ITC”) in Case No. 2:21 -cv-00240 (the “ -240 action”) , asserting infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,031,064C3 (the “’064 Patent”).