Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobile Equity Corp. v. Walmart Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00126 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 29, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00126, Dkt. No. 380
Decided
September 29, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 205 Opposed SEALED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT CERTAIN REFERENCES QUALIFY AS STATUTORY PRIOR ART filed by WALMART INC
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment that Certain References Qualify as Statutory Prior Art filed by Defendant Walmart Inc. Dkt. No. 205. Walmart moves the Court to qualify various references as prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 102. The references under consideration are: (1) U.S. Patent No. 8,332,323, (2) U.S. Patent Application Publication 2016/0275478A1, (3) Eurasian Patent EA 008185B1, (4) U.S. Patent Application Publication 2003/0055675A1, (5) U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/0073027A1, (6) U.S. Patent No.