Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobile Equity Corp. v. Walmart Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00126 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2022)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00126, Dkt. No. 377
Decided
September 28, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 364 Report and Recommendations re 196 Sealed Motion, filed by WALMART INC., 200 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by MOBILE EQUITY CORP
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

D efendant Walmart Inc. previously filed a Motion f or Summary Judgment of Non - Infringement With Respect To (1) Claims 6 -9, 13, and 15-19 of the '236 Patent; (2) Claims 2, 4, 5, 7, 9-12, a nd 15-30 of the '058 Patent; (3) Doctrine Of Equivalents; (4) Contributory Infringement; and (5) Induced Infringement (“Walmart’s Motion”) (Dkt. No. 196.) Plaintiff Mobile Equity Corp. previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment f or No Failure to Mark under 28 U.S.C. 287 (“Mobile Equity’s Motion”) (Dkt. No.