Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobile Equity Corp. v. Walmart Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00126 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 27, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00126, Dkt. No. 375
Decided
September 27, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 201 Opposed SEALED MOTION DAUBERT MOTION TO STRIKE OPINIONS OFFERED BY DR. STEPHEN BECKER filed by WALMART INC
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Opinions Offered by Dr. Stephen Becker filed by Defendant Walmart Inc. Dkt. No. 201. I. Background On April 7, 2021, Plaintiff Mobile Equity Corp. filed the present suit alleging Walmar t infringes U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,589,236 (the “’236 Patent”) and 10,535,058 (the “’058 Patent”). Mobile Equity served the expert report of Dr. Becker concerning damages. Dkt. No. 201-2. Walmart seeks to exclude Dr. Becker’s damages opinions in their entirety for certain alleged deficiencies that render Dr.