Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Longhorn HD LLC. v. NetScout Systems, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-00349 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2022)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00349, Dkt. No. 129
Decided
March 31, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting 76 Motion to Strike Expert Reports of Dr. Kevin Jaffay and Dr. Nisha Mody Regarding Non-Infringing Alternatives filed by Plaintiff Longhorn HD LLC
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Expert Reports of Dr. Kevin Jaffay and Dr. Nisha Mody Regarding Non-Infringing Alternatives filed by Plaintiff Longhorn HD LLC. Dkt. No. 76. Plaintiff moves the Court to exclude Defendant NetScout Systems, Inc. ’s expert opinions regarding whether NetScout’s Omnis IDS/Suricata Product can be considered a non -infringing alternative. Id. at 4.1 The Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the present suit on November 5, 2020 alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,260,846 (the “‘ 846 Patent ”). Dkt. No.