Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Longhorn HD LLC. v. NetScout Systems, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-00349 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00349, Dkt. No. 124
Decided
March 27, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 74 SEALED PATENT MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS OPENING EXPERT REPORT REGARDING INFRINGEMENT THAT EXCEED THE SCOPE OF LONGHORNS P.R. 3-1 INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Exclude Portions of Plaintiff’s Opening Expert Report Regarding Infringement that Exceed the Scope of Longhorn’s P.R. 3-1 Infringement Contentions, filed by D efendant NetScout Systems, Inc. Dkt. No. 74. Defendant moves the Court to strike certain opinions of Plaintiff Longhorn HD, LLC.’s technical expert because certain opinions are allegedly outside the scope of Plaintiff’s infringement contentions. Id . at 3. 1 The Motion is DENIED. I.