Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

U.S. Silica Company v. Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG, No. 2:20-cv-00298 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 16, 2023)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00298, Dkt. No. 339
Decided
August 16, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 319 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by U.S. Silica Company
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff U.S. Silica Company’s (“U.S. Silica”) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 319). Having considered the briefing, case record, and relevant authorities, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be DENIED for the reasons set forth herein. I. BACKGROUND U.S. Silica brought suit against Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick Gmbh & Co. KG (“AKW”) for patent infringement alleging that AKW infringed U.S. Patent Nos.