Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

U.S. Silica Company v. Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG, No. 2:20-cv-00298 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2023)

Denied
Inequitable Conduct
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00298, Dkt. No. 315
Decided
March 16, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUPPORTED BY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW REGARDING THE EQUITABLE DEFENSE OF INEQUITABLE CONDUCT re 287
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG’s (“AKW”) Motion Under Rules 52(a) and 58 that the Asserted Patents are Unenforceable Due to Inequitable Conduct . (Dkt. No. 287). The Court has considered the totality of the evidence presented at the jury trial and in the written record, including the post -trial submissions from the parties (Dkt. Nos. 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 287, 293, 308, 310).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case