Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

U.S. Silica Company v. Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG, No. 2:20-cv-00298 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2023)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00298, Dkt. No. 316
Decided
March 29, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF re 282 MOTION for Permanent Injunction or Alternatively for an Ongoing Royalty on Future Sales filed by U.S. Silica Company
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is U.S. Silica Company’s (“U.S. Silica ”) Motion for Permanent Injunction, or Alternatively, For an Ongoing Royalty on Future Sales (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 282). Having considered the Motion, the related briefing, and the applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED-AS-MODIFIED. I. BACKGROUND 1. The Claimed Invention and U.S. Silica’s Business In 2017, U.S. Silica purchased National Coatings Corporation ’s (“National Coatings”) intellectual property. (Dkt. No. 260 at 178:2–6).