Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Optis Wireless Technology, LLC et al v. Apple Inc., No. 2:19-cv-00066 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2026)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00066, Dkt. No. 807
Decided
January 29, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - The Court issues this Order sua sponte re 771 NOTICE of Claim Narrowing
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Court issues this Order sua sponte. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that Plaintiffs Optis Wireless Technology, LLC, Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, PanOptis Patent Management, LLC, Unwired Planet LLC, and Unwired Planet International Limited’s (collectively, “Optis”) claims of patent infringement as to claims 1 and 5 of U.S. Pa tent No. 8,411,557 (the “’557 Patent”) should be either LIVE ISSUES before the Court or DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND On appeal, the U.S.