Optis Wireless Technology, LLC et al v. Apple Inc., No. 2:19-cv-00066 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2020)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Dismiss Count V III of Plaintiffs ’ Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. (Dkt. N o. 16.) Count VIII of Plaintiffs ’ Complaint has been superseded by Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint ( see Dkt. No. 26), and consequently, the Court is of the opinion that this motion should be and hereby is DENIED- AS- MOOT. See King v. Dogan, 31 F.3d 344, 346 (5th Cir. 1994) (“An amended complaint supersedes the original complaint and renders it of no legal effect . . . .”).