Optis Wireless Technology, LLC et al v. Apple Inc., No. 2:19-cv-00066 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 27, 2026)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two motions: (a) the Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity (the “Apple Motion”) (Dkt. No. 774) filed by Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”); and (b) the Motion for Summary Judgment that the ’332 Patent Is Not Invalid (the “Optis Motion”) filed by Plaint iffs Optis Wireless Technology, LLC, Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, and PanOptis Patent Management, LLC, Unwired Planet, LLC, and Unwired Planet International Limited (collectively, “Optis”). In the Apple Motion, Apple moves for summary judgment that cla ims 6 and 7 of U.S.